Showing posts with label lead. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lead. Show all posts
Friday, December 16, 2016
Park Hae Jin confirms lead for Cheese In the Trap the movie
Park Hae Jin confirms lead for Cheese In the Trap the movie
Article: Cheese In the Trap confirms Park Hae Jin as movie lead
Source: TV Report via Naver
1. [+3,505, -88] Hopefully he can shine as the lead this time
2. [+2,682, -80] I honestly cant imagine a Yoo Jung who isnt Park Hae Jin anyway ??? I hope they make it right this time and produce it as fun as the webtoon!!
3. [+1,860, -72] Good!!! Ill be watching for Park Hae Jin ???
4. [+322, -15] Cant wait... Cheese In the Trap is much too good of a story to let the drama ruin it
5. [+278, -8] Lets go with the original plot~~~ looks like the webtoon is nearing the end too!!!
6. [+288, -18] Hopefully they dont ruin the movie too ???
7. [+265, -18] Finally a true dramatization of the webtoon. The drama itself was ruined thanks to a certain two, you all know which two Im talking about
8. [+223, -16] Park Hae Jin himself made the decision so I support it!
-
Source: Nate
1. [+489, -12] Ugh, this reminds me of how horrible the drama was. The random divert into Baek Inho Cantabile ??? The original webtoon writer Sunkki is participating in the movie so Im sure the plot wont get lost again!
2. [+469, -7] Looks like he was really upset with the drama... its a difficult decision to decide to play the same character twice and hes still going through with it...
3. [+386, -12] Park Hae Jin ?? The biggest problem is whos going to play the female lead
-
download now
Wednesday, December 14, 2016
Great LEAD meeting has caused me to think about service dog prospects candidates
Great LEAD meeting has caused me to think about service dog prospects candidates
We had a Lake Erie Assistance Dogs meeting yesterday at Canine Affair. Besides our usual discussions, we set up different stations so that members/guests could practice for the public access test. Next month, Sue Alexander will be with us to do actual testing for our members. I took Hardy to the meeting and since no one else volunteered, he and I were the first to run through the practice test. We have never specifically worked on the public access test before but on the other hand, his behavior is such that I take him out in public so I didnt expect to have any major problems. And as it turned out, the only issues we had were his defaulting to a "down" when we were doing the various activities at the sit station and having to re-cue him for a sit when Mary came up behind us to say hello and give him a pat. Well, that and during the meeting Hardy decided my good (expensive) leather leash would be a good teething toy. While I do appreciate his need for teething opportunities, I dont appreciate his use of my leash nor his persistence (and yes, Sue, I know ... we selected him for his persistence!). Ive added a chew toy to our training bag and we will be using my old nylon leash for awhile (its purple, of course). All in all, once again, I was very proud of my now-bigger puddly!
For a bunch of reasons, I have been thinking about the dogs we decide to raise and/or train to be service dogs. One of the Yahoo Assistance Dogs lists is having a rather heated discussion right now regarding program dogs versus owner-trained dogs with accusations that owner-trainers use dogs that are alarmingly inappropriate for the work. Does that happen? Yes, I have seen examples of that but I have also seen them of program dogs who werent appropriate. Mostly, these discussions continue to make me concerned that the service dog community expects the public to "get" and support service dogs but we cant even be united! Additionally, Ive heard from a number of people recently who want advice about dogs/puppies to get to raise and train for their own service dogs. And, even though Laurel and Hardy are completely different and I try not to compare them, I still do.
When I decided to have Sue Alexander do temperament testing of all potential puppies and ultimately, help me select my 2nd service dog prospect, I did that hoping to improve the selection process resulting in a puppy well suited to doing service dog work for me. I went into it already having an amazing service dog, Laurel, who does more for me than I even knew was possible. What I didnt recognize was that having a dog who is very talented and intelligent, with a work drive/ethic as well as being incredibly willing isnt enough. Throughout Hardys puppyhood and into his adolescence, it is already obvious that it will be easier for him to deal with public access than it is for Laurel.
I think there was some dumb luck involved with Laurels success (and maybe all the phases of the moon were in alignment or something ... ) and I think I had the luxury of being able to focus on her positive traits while minimizing the negatives but I dont think her success as a service dog is the important thing. What is important is that because of who Laurel is (and despite her willingness and enthusiasm), being a full public access service dog is a difficult, stressful job for her. She would never tell you that but that doesnt mean it isnt true!
Im a firm believer in the adage, "When you know better, you do better". I feel that is what I did in asking for Sues help picking my next service dog candidate and although people seem very surprised when I mention that Hardy will be taking over most public access duties once he is completely trained, I think I owe that to my Laurel girl. Everyone who knows us knows that I adore my goofy yellow girl and now that I know that she is doing her job for me in spite of who she is, I appreciate her that much more! But I also realize that this could have been a miserable life for her and I dont want to see that happening to other willing, talented, intelligent but ill-suited dogs. Now, if Laurel can teach Hardy a fraction of what she has taught me, he will indeed grow up to be an amazing boy!
download now
Sunday, September 11, 2016
Lee Yeon Hee in talks for new lead in The Package
Lee Yeon Hee in talks for new lead in The Package
Article: [Exclusive] Lee Yeon Hee in talks for lead role in drama The Package
Source: OSEN via Naver
1. [+5,010, -192] She gets so much hate for being bad but still gets lead roles, the power of SM
2. [+3,827, -161] She talks like shes reading out of a textbook, has no pitch in her lines, maintains the same monotonous tone from start to finish, awkward facial expressions... man, I really hope she practiced her acting this time..
3. [+3,472, -156] Decent visuals but cant act or pronounce her words. Your textbook SM actor.
4. [+2,838, -163] Please stop acting... youre so bad
5. [+2,350, -153] What is wrong with the casting team... I really like Lee Yeon Hee, shes pretty and all that, but acting is not for her.
6. [+573, -22] The only role shed be perfect for is a mute. Oh but then again, her facial expressions are just as awkward too...
7. [+542, -19] Shes had the most acting controversies out of any actress, why do they keep using her?
8. [+466, -19] Another round of bad acting expected ??????
9. [+449, -19] All of the dramas shes been in have flopped, her actings too awkward
10. [+363, -16] She was honestly alright on Miss Korea so I thought she was finally putting effort into her acting... until I saw Hwajung
11. [+310, -13] I wish shed stick to doing CFs ? and leave the acting to real actors... shes been doing this for years and never shows any improvement ?? everything about her is just so rigid
12. [+186, -5] I personally think the top two actors who never improve in their acting are Lee Yeon Hee and Song Seung Hun... so when they shot East of Eden together, the combination of their bad acting was incredible ??????????????
-
download now
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)